Robyn Benson re-elected PSAC National President

Robyn Benson was re-elected as the National President of the Public Service Alliance of Canada this morning at the PSAC’s 17th National Triennial Convention. Benson was first elected as PSAC president in 2012 and previously served as the Regional Executive Vice-President (REVP) for the PSAC Prairie Region since 2000. In accepting the new mandate, Benson thanked the delegates for their support. “It will be an honour and a privilege to serve our members for the next three years.” Benson has always been and continues to be an advocate for human rights, social justice and strong public services, and is vehemently opposed to public service cuts. She has made it her mission to defend the collective bargaining rights of PSAC members and all workers in Canada. “We will work for change on October 19,” said Benson. She pledges to continue to work with others to win social justice and equality for all.

 

April 30, 2015

Questions re: designations

If you have questions regarding the upcoming designations, (essential services) please email them to us @ localceiu581@gmail.com

We will gather questions, do some research and plan an information session in the near future.

Thank you.

CEIU Local 581 exec team

 

Postal workers union says sick leave reform didn’t work for them

By Julie Ireton, CBC News Posted: Apr 29, 2015 10:52 AM ETLast Updated: Apr 29, 2015 10:52 AM ET

Denis Lemelin, president of the union representing Canadian postal workers, says the new sick leave system for postal workers has led to people coming in to work sick.

Denis Lemelin, president of the union representing Canadian postal workers, says the new sick leave system for postal workers has led to people coming in to work sick. (Julie Ireton/BC)

The head of the union representing postal workers says the federal government’s plan to modernize sick leave for public servants sounds like déjà vu.

Denis Lemelin, president of the Canadian Union of Postal Workers, said the relatively new sick leave system at Canada Post hasn’t worked out for his members or the workplace.

“It changed a lot of things,” said Lemelin. “It’s the fact that it’s personal days and what is happening is people are coming to work sick, so that’s the reality.”

Canada Post negotiated a new sick leave policy that was implemented in 2013 after a labour dispute, during which sick leave was one of the key issues.

CUPW members went from being allowed 15 sick days a year to the current system of five personal days, Lemelin said.

Once those five days are used up, postal workers must then apply to an insurance company for short term disability.

Sick leave big issue in current negotiations

Right now, the federal government and public sector unions are at odds over a new sick leave policy for public sector workers. In last week’s budget, the government said it could save more than $1 billion by scrapping the current sick leave regime. 

Robyn Benson, president of the Public Service Alliance of Canada, says the new Canada Post sick leave plan is a cautionary tale for her members.

But public sector unions have vowed to fight the cut.

Robyn Benson, president of the union representing the largest number of federal workers, the Public Service Alliance of Canada, said the Canada Post example is a cautionary tale for her members. 

“At Canada Post for example, they get X amount of days … but if you don’t have those you go on leave without pay,” said Benson. “It’s certainly not management now trying to ensure that their employees are healthy. This is an insurance company saying, oh, you must come back to work. I think, on so many levels, it’s just wrong.”

The insurance company that runs the short-term disability program for Canada Post is Morneau Shepell. When the federal government initially announced it would revamp the sick leave system, Morneau Shepell sent out a media release praising the initiative.

“We applaud the Government of Canada for taking a much-needed step to modernize its human resources practices,” stated the news release from June 2013. 

‘I’m here for the public servant who wants to work hard …,’ Treasury Board president says

Officials at the Treasury Board would not say how much a public service new sick leave system will cost to implement.

“I’m here for the public servant who wants to work hard, who needs sick benefits when they are truly sick … but I’m also for accountability … on behalf of the taxpayer,” said Treasury Board President Tony Clement last Wednesday in a scrum with the press.

Canada Post said its revamped sick leave plan was “part of a long-term strategic initiative to align costs with our competitors” and was drawn from industry best practices.

But officials there would not say if any savings have been realized.

“This information is commercially sensitive and therefore not public,” Canada Post stated in a note to CBC News.

Emergency PSAC Resolution – Ottawa Citizen article

national-president-of-the-public-service-alliance-of-canadaPSAC convention: The showdown over sick leave begins

Kathryn May, Ottawa Citizen
More from Kathryn May, Ottawa Citizen Published on: April 26, 2015
Last Updated: April 26, 2015 10:09 PM EDT ​
Public Service Alliance of Canada president Robyn Benson says the government has gone too far, and its plan to bring in a new short-term disability plan whether a deal is negotiated or not is the ‘straw that broke the camel’s back.’

Graeme Murphy / Ottawa Citizen ​Share
Adjust
Comment
Print The largest union representing workers in Canada’s non-partisan public service is appealing to its members to defeat the Conservatives in the upcoming election as part of a sweeping emergency resolution to “beat back” the government’s attack on collective bargaining rights and sick leave benefits.

More than 700 delegates are gathered in Quebec City this week for the Public Service Alliance of Canada’s triennial convention. The dominant issue will be an emergency resolution drafted after the government booked a one-time $900-million savings in last week’s budget to replace public servants existing sick leave benefits with a new short-term disability plan even though contract negotiations are still underway.

“It is time to get every PSAC member to vote to rid Canada of the Conservatives once and for all,” PSAC president Robyn Benson said in an opening speech to the delegates.

“Never has political action been more important. We’ve had enough of the attack on labour rights and on equality groups.”

AdvertisementPSAC is the most political and militant of the 17 federal unions and has crossed the line for some public servants, such as when several of its locals endorsed separatist candidates in the 2006 election. But this is the first time the union’s national leadership has pointedly told members to help defeat the government.

Federal employees must carefully balance their obligations as public servants — to be loyal and politically impartial — with their constitutional right to participate in political activities.

Benson, who is seeking a second uncontested term as PSAC’s president, said she has never told members how to vote. In the last election, she said, the union urged members to get out and vote while reminding them of the Conservatives’ track record on public services.

This time, she said, the government went too far, and its plan to bring in a new short-term disability plan whether a deal is negotiated or not is the “straw that broke the camel’s back.

“We are saying enough is enough. We have to defeat this government,” she said in an interview.

In her speech, Benson rhymed off the Conservative policies she said were widening the inequality gap, stretching public services to the breaking point, and trampling all workers’ collective bargaining rights. The message was clear: the attack on public servants’ benefits and collective bargaining rights is part of the government’s assault on public services to shrink the size of the state.

“Inequality … doesn’t just happen by accident,” she said. “It is the result of deliberate political choices by government. We can change those choices. We can change the government and that’s exactly what we are going to do.”

The weeklong convention promises to be a pivotal gathering of the giant union as it maps out a bargaining strategy when it returns to the table with the government’s new position.

At the top of the agenda is an emergency resolution the union’s board of directors unanimously passed on the weekend calling for the union to mobilize, organize, campaign and take legal action against the government. It will be debated Monday.

The resolution “condemns” the Conservative government for eroding unions’ bargaining power, flouting their constitutional right to collective bargaining, reducing public servants’ severance, pension, health care benefits, and now unilaterally taking aim at the 15 million days public servants have banked in paid sick leave.

Benson says the union won’t make concessions on sick leave. “If the Conservatives try to legislate any of our contracts before the next election, we’ll respond swiftly and effectively. We will not tolerate any interference in free collective bargaining.”

Sick leave is at the centre of the current round of collective bargaining that’s been underway for a year. The 17 unions are united in their refusal to give up the 15 days of bankable sick leave public servants now receive in exchange for a disability plan proposed by Treasury Board President Tony Clement. His proposal would limit paid sick days to six a year.

The unions are now under pressure to counter the government’s move, take action, or explain to Canadians why Clement’s proposal is unfair and doesn’t work. They have various legal options, such as taking the government to court or filing a complaint of bad-faith bargaining with the Public Service Labour Relations and Employment Board.

PSAC’s resolution also comes several days after the 17 federal unions met and reaffirmed the “solidarity pact” they signed a year ago to present a common front in this round of bargaining on sick leave. As the largest union, however, PSAC’s plan could signal that the other unions could take similar political action to “mobilize” and defeat the Conservative government.

The solidarity pact is an unlikely alliance of unions representing workers in very different jobs, from dock workers to doctors and prison guards to lawyers, but it has shown no cracks no far. Unlike PSAC, many of these unions have traditionally steered clear of militancy and any political activity that has even a whiff of partisanship.

One union official explained the solidarity pact was signed to ensure unity in opposing concessions on sick leave. The various unions have agreed to co-ordinate and work together on any advertising and political campaigns, but each is free to “do their own thing” and tailor their campaigns to what their members want.

The Professional Institute of the Public Service of Canada approved a similar strategy to PSAC’s at its annual meeting several months ago when delegates voted to “take all necessary” political action — short of becoming partisan — to defeat the government.

“We very much want a change in government,” said PIPSC president Debi Daviau. “Are we targeting Conservatives? … In strict partisan terms no, but we will be holding the Conservatives’ feet to the fire on the issues that are important to our members.”

PSAC’s proposed ‘emergency resolution’ for vote on Monday
WHEREAS the federal Conservative government has repeatedly adopted legislation undermining the rights, benefits, health and safety and collective agreements of PSAC members and all federal public sector workers; and

WHEREAS this government now intends to legislate changes to sick leave protection contained in collective agreements covering most PSAC members and other federal public sector workers; and

WHEREAS this government has already violated our constitutional right to collective bargaining through budget implementation legislation; therefore

BE IT RESOLVED THAT we, the PSAC, condemn the Conservative government for undermining the collective bargaining process and its intention to unilaterally take away our members’ negotiated sick leave benefits; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT we stand up and oppose any government actions that will compromise any of our members’ rights; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT we will continue to organize and mobilize our members through concerted and strategic actions with other unions to defend our bargaining rights; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT we will take the necessary legal action to defend our constitutional right to free collective bargaining; and

BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT we will work to elect a federal government that respects worker and union rights and federal public services, and that governs for the benefit of all Canadian workers; and

BE IT FINALLY RESOLVED THAT we will not let this government or any future government intimidate us or take away our rights.

Reminder: Posters to send to Bargaining Team -Need more participation!

bargainposter
Hello everyone.
Can you please write something or at least sign your name to one of the posters I have placed around 457 Richmond Street:6th floor lunchroom
4th floor business centre
3rd floor lunchroom
2nd floor bulletin board
1st floor lunchroom

(I also sent posters to the smaller offices, so hopefully they were received and are up. Next time I will send postage to make it easier, but you can mail them in yourself and submit your expense claim or send back to me to mail in)

I want them to be full!The next discussion between our bargaining team and TB/employer is supposed to be happening in May. These posters will be displayed behind the table where the bargaining team actually sits. Let’s do our little part and contribute to a strong visual showing of solidarity of our members. I want to get them mailed in ASAP.

Thanks!
Sara JV

Federal public service unions united to defend their right to collective bargaining

Federal public service unions are united in their opposition to the Conservative government’s plan to unilaterally eliminate the existing sick leave provisions in their collective agreements. In a meeting today, the federal public service unions, which together represent more than 166,000 employees, agreed to develop a common response to the federal government’s proposal. 

via Federal public service unions united to defend their right to collective bargaining.

Canada’s truthiest election campaign begins: Don Pittis

stephen-colbert-truthiness
True or not, politicians defend their promises with passion and confidence
By Don Pittis, CBC News Posted: Apr 23, 2015 5:00 AM ET|

The Harper Conservatives are the balanced-budget party. You might as well get that into your head now, because you are going to be hearing it repeated till election day.

This is also the economic stewardship party, the spending-on-transit party and the party fighting for the poor and middle class. Yesterday, Finance Minister Joe Oliver even implied they were the fight-against-climate-change party.

An independent analyst might dispute those statements. In fact, independent analysts in newspapers and columns across the country have been doing just that this week following Oliver’s federal budget. But in what is shaping up to be Canada’s “truthiest” election campaign, scientific evidence doesn’t strictly matter.

■Joe Oliver’s budget: Ignore the sleight of hand
■Conservatives dig into contingency to hit surplus
Truthiness, as coined by U.S. comedian Stephen Colbert, is something expressed as a truth because it is a feeling from the heart without evidence or logic.

After reading a wonderful piece by Oxford economist John Kay called “How beliefs became truths for the political establishment,” it struck me that this is exactly what we are seeing in our own Canadian (pre-) election campaign.

As well as claiming a balanced budget, Oliver promised spending on transit and other infrastructure and tax breaks that would stimulate the economy. But there may be less substance to these boasts than appear.

Economical with the truth
There is nothing new in the accusation that politicians are economical with the truth. In fact, in a system like Canada’s, where caucus solidarity is so strongly enforced, the ability to lie with a straight face is essential for survival. That’s because no matter what your true feelings are on any issue, you must always speak and act as if the party line is actually your own.

As well as claiming a balanced budget, Finance Minister Joe Oliver promised spending on transit and other infrastructure and tax breaks that would stimulate the economy. (The Canadian Press)

But truthiness is different. Instead of just white lies to make sure everyone sings from the same songbook, with truthiness, the party view becomes an article of faith.

“Truthiness is the belief that comes when conviction is prized over information,” Kay wrote in Tuesday’s Financial Times.

Kay refers to the case of U.S. presidential candidate Rick Santorum, who once maintained that the elderly in the Netherlands were being “euthanized involuntarily.” When Dutch citizens complained it was factually not true, a Santorum aide justified the statement on the grounds that the politician “says what’s in his heart.”

Kay says conservatives do not have a lock on truthiness, quoting a Guardian commentator who insisted that we should believe Rolling Stone magazine’s alleged rape victim at the University of Virginia on principle, even after her accusations were disproved.

Partisan conclusions
In elections, the danger implied in truthiness is that it takes dishonesty an extra step so that it cannot be honestly challenged. And that is one more nail in the coffin of evidence-based democracy.

Instead of a careful examination of issues and their consequences, we jump, first, to partisan conclusions. It represents the destruction of Socratic logic, so we no longer examine the thesis, then the antithesis and come to a synthesis. Why bother? We already know the answers.

It is true that scientific evidence can be interpreted in many ways. Economics is even less stable ground, with each economist offering a different description of what is happening in the world.

But in this Canadian pre-election campaign, we are entering a never-never-land where facts seem to have become unimportant.

According to the Bank of Canada, the economy grew at zero percent at the beginning of the year – yet Oliver takes credit for wise financial stewardship. Spending for promises such as infrastructure projects doesn’t kick in until after the election, when the Conservatives may not even be in power. And as almost everyone except our finance minister has observed, balancing a budget with contingency reserves and assets sales is balancing in name only.

The truth behind truthy
The odd thing is that speaking a truth all of us can believe may have helped the government more than it hurt. It may well be true that cutting taxes is the best of all forms of stimulus. It may be that helping well-off Canadians with income splitting and higher limits on tax-free savings accounts will help the entire economy, creating capital pools and motivating the poor.

It may be that Conservatives truly believe climate change is not true, or not a problem. If so, they should tell us why it is so, not send the environment minister to accuse the provinces of not doing enough to mitigate it or the natural resources minister to boast of the government’s “already exemplary record of environmental performance.”

■Ottawa says provinces fall short on greenhouse gas cuts
I’m not sure the comments section below this column is an accurate sample of the Canadian electorate, but I am often disturbed by the polarized and “truthy” debate from those who support the Harper government and those who come to opposing conclusions, writing from the heart, not the head.

Truthiness is the home and refuge of the true believer. Each party has those, and we know which way they will vote.

But elections are decided by the undecided. As the New Democrats, Liberals, Greens and others begin to bring out their own platforms, the voters who count will be the ones who look for the truth behind the truthy.

7 Times Joe Oliver’s Budget Speech Departs from Reality

APR 21, 2015 by PressProgress
Hyperbole alert!
Finance Minister Joe Oliver delivered his budget on Tuesday. Here’s seven problems with what Oliver had to say about the state of Canada’s fiscal affairs:
1. But is the world an ocean of chaos? And is Canada an island of stability?
Joe Oliver says:
“Around the world, many nations — including some of our friends and allies — remain mired in a struggle for fiscal security … Still the news for Canada is, by and large, good. Amid the tumult, our country remains a beacon of economic stability and security built on a foundation of sound financial management.”
Reality check:
According to Oliver’s own budget, the recent drop in oil prices is going to mean chaos for Canada.
“As a producer and net exporter of crude oil,” the budget says Canada will see “a significant downward revision to the outlook for economy-wide prices and therefore, nominal GDP.” And what of the rest of the world? Low oil prices “will be generally positive for global growth,” says the budget — particularly for countries that import oil.
But although it projects “weaker investment and hiring within the energy sector,” the government says low oil prices could (eventually) lead to “positive impacts” for other sectors of the economy. Just probably not in the near future.
2. Is Canadian economic growth, in fact, “solid”?
Joe Oliver says:
“Mr. Speaker, our economy is now substantially larger than it was pre-recession, a performance that remains the envy of the G-7. International observers expect Canada’s growth — already ahead of our peers during the recovery — to continue to be solid…”
Reality check:
According to the Department of Finance, private sector economists say “economic data to date for early 2015 suggest the real GDP growth in the first quarter is likely to be weaker than expected, or even flat.” Economists now say real GDP growth will fall to 1.2% in the first quarter of 2015, while projections for nominal GDP growth over the year have been reduced from 4.3% to 1.6%.
What else? Economists predict oil prices won’t rise above $65 this year, and predict a gradual climb to $80 by 2019 (in other words, even after four years, oil isn’t expected to return to recent highs).
But since he seems to think the economy is so “solid,” maybe that explains why the budget doesn’t really include anything to stabilize Alberta’s economy?
3. If Canada is the story of “opportunity,” is this the chapter where “opportunity” takes a nap?
Joe Oliver says:
“The story of Canada is — has always been — the story of opportunity. Opportunity is what has drawn people here from around the world, generation after generation … Opportunity for themselves and for their families, the opportunity to work hard, dream big, and achieve those dreams.”
Reality check:
How’s the Canadian dream doing?
“Lower employment in the energy sector will have some negative effects on household income,” the budget says. And “lower equity prices in the energy sector will have an impact on household wealth, which could mostly reduce consumer spending.”
So, the story of Canada is the story of fewer jobs, lower incomes and less money in the bank?
4. Is reducing revenues to historic lows something worth bragging about?
Joe Oliver says:
“We have cut taxes to their lowest level in more than half a century.”
Reality check:
While the Conservatives can correctly take credit for reducing revenues to historic lows, it’s not clear that’s something worth taking credit for — that’s the reason Canada didn’t have a balanced budget in the first place.

And you don’t really think average families are the ones who’ve benefitted from all these tax cuts, do you?
• Income splitting: A $2 billion tax cut that mainly benefits the wealthiest families in Canada.
• Tax Free Savings Accounts: The Conservatives will double the TFSA contribution limit to $10,000 per year, amounting to a $300 million loss in revenue over five years. However, as explained in a recent Broadbent Institute report authored by TFSA architect Jonathan Rhys Kesselman, “a doubled TFSA would be heavily tilted toward high-income earners and wealth holders” since they are more likely to have an extra $5,000 lying around to put in a TFSA.
• Corporate tax cuts: The Conservatives’ reductions to the corporate tax rate have led to an estimated annual loss of $12 billion in revenue. Corporate Canada currently sits on a $600 billion hoard of unused ‘dead money.’
• Boutique tax credits: And while many of the Conservatives’ boutique tax credits aimed at children and families sound good in theory, many of them amount to “meaningless” savings for typical families. In fact, both by the way they’re structured and how they’re used, these tax credits more often than not skew to benefit wealthy Canadians.
5. Why are Conservatives taking credit for paying down the debt if they didn’t do anything?
Joe Oliver says:
“When our government first came to power, we worked hard to reduce Canada’s substantial federal debt. We did it in short order, by more than $37 billion.”
Reality check:
Earlier this week, former senior Finance Canada policy experts Scott Clark and Peter Devries described Oliver’s history of Canadian finances as pure “fantasy economics.”

Here’s what Clark and Devries has to say about the Conservatives’ fiscal record:
“How does this compare to the Harper government’s fiscal record? In 2006-07, the Conservatives inherited a surplus of $13.8 billion — which they turned into a deficit of $5.8 billion within two years.

Since then, they have been in deficit each and every year. In 2009-10, the deficit reached its peak of 3.5 per cent of GDP. They are desperate now to show a surplus in 2015-16 — one surplus in nine years. Since Harper was elected, the federal debt has increased by over $150 billion.”
6. Can you borrow your way to prosperity or can’t you?
Joe Oliver says:
“We cannot borrow our way to prosperity — no matter what our opponents might say.”
Reality check:
But a short time later, Oliver says “in times of crisis, a deficit may be the appropriate action.”
So can you or can’t you? Both these statements can’t be true.
7. Joe Oliver, how dumb do you think Canadians are, really?
Joe Oliver says:
“We are the only government in our nation’s history to reduce Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions — proof that emissions can decline even as economic growth increases.”
Reality check:
Really? The same government led by Stephen Harper, who only a few short months ago called the idea of reducing carbon emissions a “crazy economic policy”?